{"id":19,"date":"2007-12-12T17:27:28","date_gmt":"2007-12-12T22:27:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/2007\/12\/12\/flynn-ceci-and-turkheimer-on-race-and-intelligence-opening-moves\/"},"modified":"2007-12-12T19:45:43","modified_gmt":"2007-12-13T00:45:43","slug":"flynn-ceci-and-turkheimer-on-race-and-intelligence-opening-moves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/2007\/12\/12\/flynn-ceci-and-turkheimer-on-race-and-intelligence-opening-moves\/","title":{"rendered":"Flynn, Ceci, and Turkheimer on Race and Intelligence: Opening Moves"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>\nThe series of posts by these three authors illustrates, in microcosm, the melange of criticism commonly marshaled against mainstream science on intelligence in order to seem to discredit it without actually engaging its large interlocking body of evidence. Indeed, the criticism succeeds precisely by avoiding such engagement. There are two general strategies for avoiding the totality of relevant evidence: (1) create doubt about some small portion of it as if that isolated doubt nullified the totality of evidence, and (2) put unwelcome evidence off-limits by labeling it immoral or ill-motivated.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><strong>The game here is not to suppress discussion of genetic differences but to suppress knowledge of phenotypic differences. The latter make the former more plausible, so the specter of genetic causation is used as a club to beat back scientific knowledge about racial disparities in developed abilities, whatever their origins.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato-unbound.org\/2007\/11\/26\/linda-s-gottfredson\/flynn-ceci-and-turkheimer-on-race-and-intelligence-opening-moves\">Original Article here<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato-unbound.org\/2007\/11\/08\/linda-s-gottfredson\/shattering-logic-to-explain-the-flynn-effect\/\">More thoughts by Linda S. Gottfredson<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato-unbound.org\/archives\/november-2007\/\">from The IQ Conundrum at Cato Unbound<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The series of posts by these three authors illustrates, in microcosm, the melange of criticism commonly marshaled against mainstream science on intelligence in order to seem to discredit it without actually engaging its large interlocking body of evidence. Indeed, the criticism succeeds precisely by avoiding such engagement. There are two general strategies for avoiding the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetics","category-human-nature","category-intelligence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}