{"id":325,"date":"2020-08-03T19:59:28","date_gmt":"2020-08-04T00:59:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/?p=325"},"modified":"2020-08-03T20:15:09","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T01:15:09","slug":"socialism-and-human-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/2020\/08\/03\/socialism-and-human-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Socialism and Human nature"},"content":{"rendered":"

Why Socialists Should Believe in Human Nature<\/a><\/p>\n

But our antagonist\u2019s view of human nature is one in which we care only about these things, in which we only care about maximizing returns from the world to ourselves. This is the bourgeois view. The abstract human is basically like a two-year-old on an airplane. Nobody else matters. And if this were true, our project would be doomed. Out of toddlers on an airplane, I think you\u2019d probably be able to build a world of an Ayn Rand novel, but you wouldn\u2019t be able to build socialism. But the bourgeois view is only partly correct. Humans are capable of many things other than simple selfishness. We\u2019re capable of caring for others, we\u2019re capable of empathy and compassion, we have the capacity to distinguish fairness from unfairness, and the capacity to hold ourselves to those standards.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The phrase that stikes me here is “capable of many things other than simple selfishness”. But it really should be many things in addtion to simple selfishness.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Think about the way in which society is organized. What do people have to do to reproduce themselves? What do they have to do to other people in order to reproduce themselves? These facts exercise selectional pressures on the set of drives that constitute our human nature. The socialist wager, in a sentence, is that a better society would encourage our better tendencies.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Whoa. That sure does take a leap of faith. Let’s adopt socialism because it will make us better people.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The second point is that socialism would also be a much more egalitarian society. People would be each other\u2019s equals \u2014 not subordinates or superiors.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

But people are inherently vastly unequal.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

In a more developed, and more egalitarian society, better humans will flourish. Socialists one, libertarian cousin zero.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

And you make all that don’t fit this mold miserable?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Looking Backward On Socialism: A Radical Denial Of Human Nature \u2013 Marotta On Money<\/a><\/p>\n

One of the most common socialist assumptions is that it is possible to perfect society. They believe that enough humans are sufficiently altruistic that, if only they were put in positions of power and control, they would be able to guide the rest of mankind to a similar state of near perfection.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A little simplistic I think.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Why Socialists Should Believe in Human Nature But our antagonist\u2019s view of human nature is one in which we care only about these things, in which we only care about maximizing returns from the world to ourselves. This is the bourgeois view. The abstract human is basically like a two-year-old on an airplane. Nobody else […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=325"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":329,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325\/revisions\/329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gentropy.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}